Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Qwen3.8 Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	71/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	83/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Qwen

NVIDIA

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Qwen

NVIDIA

Pricing

Input

$0.16/ 1M

$0.07/ 1M

Output

$0.47/ 1M

$0.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.02/ 1M

$0.04/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

222K

193K

Completed sessions

2,539,673

5,927,227

Token share

0.2%

0.31%

Tokens

2.6T+215%

4T+34%

SEP 8NOV 2

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

61.2%9.7K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini