Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 25/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$1.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.08/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
119K
116K
Completed sessions
572,745
1,258,713
Token share
0.02%
0.05%
Tokens
248B-8%
672B-60%
SEP 8NOV 2
SEP 8NOV 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
42.6%4.7K user-weeks
61.7%6.1K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Plus vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Plus·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Plus vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Plus·Jamba Mini