Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 57/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-6 Luna | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 45/100 | 72/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
76K
996K
Completed sessions
1,013,784
7,945,702
Token share
0.23%
0.38%
Tokens
3T+100%
4.9T+100%
SEP 8NOV 2
SEP 8NOV 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
65.1%13K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 Luna·Jamba Mini