Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 31/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 45/100 | 72/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.35/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$4.05/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
404K
996K
Completed sessions
1,494,353
7,945,702
Token share
0.43%
0.38%
Tokens
5.5T-81%
4.9T+100%
SEP 8NOV 2
SEP 8NOV 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56%30K user-weeks
65.1%13K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 Luna·Jamba Mini