Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 69/100 | 81/100 | 58/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 64/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
52K
295K
Completed sessions
550,425
1,879,410
Token share
0.02%
0.17%
Tokens
309B-22%
2.2T-64%
SEP 8NOV 2
SEP 8NOV 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.7%643 user-weeks
52.5%23K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5.6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5.6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.6 Luna·Jamba Mini