Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna

MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	80/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GPT-6 Luna	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	45/100	72/100	98/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

MiniMax

OpenAI

Context length

1.1M

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text, Image, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

OpenAI

Pricing

Input

$0.07/ 1M

$0.10/ 1M

Output

$0.30/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

Cached input

$0.0075/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

950K

996K

Completed sessions

125,657,534

7,945,702

Token share

14.7%

0.38%

Tokens

188T+100%

4.9T+100%

SEP 8NOV 2

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

72.3%14K user-weeks

65.1%13K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGPT-6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6 LunaDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 LunaJamba Mini