Compare AI models: GPT-4o vs Qwen3.7 Max
- GPT-4oOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 25/100 | 16/100 | 24/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 32/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
128K
1M
Reasoning
False
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.50/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$3.75/ 1M
Cached input
$1.25/ 1M
$0.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
31K
Completed sessions
13
76,332
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
100K+100%
17B-92%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
42.7%709 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-4o vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-4o·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-4o vs Jamba MiniGPT-4o·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba Mini